In Washington State this is pay your property taxes month, although it's really more like rent now as the State has made it clear it holds ultimate ownership of all lands. They forgot the Emperor holds original title to All the Northern Provinces, and my Brother, The King, holds all of the California's and a few points east and south, you see when we were much younger we split the west coast of North America up into two domains, that was many years ago; I claimed the North and he claimed the South.
Back to Washington, this State is unique in that it is the only State in the US that uses the term "True and Fair Value" when speaking of property taxes. That terminology begins in the State Constitution and follows through in all of the laws written.
However; there is a problem.
Few Citizens understand what that really means and the assessors have changed its original intent into current fair market value which means they now collect taxes based on inflation.
Each year property owners are mailed a small postcard advising of the next years tax value. Few if any read the fine print which tells one how to go about protesting, appealing the increase, and it's always an increase.
It has taken me most of the past four years to sift out the truth and find evidence to prove almost everyone is being overtaxed on the property, their homes. And more importantly it took me a lot of time to find a written court decision to back up what I know to be the real truth. Funny it is that what one says is always taken with a grain of salt if that much, while what you find was said previously, even if it was a hundred or more years ago is given great weight and consideration.
Each year I win a bit more as I find more evidence to support my position. But it is an uphill, up mountain battle.
This year at the first round, the county board of equalization, I was astounded at the lack of consideration on the other side of the table. You see this year I presented a 92 page brief, my basic argument, a collection of facts, evidence, and explanations.
The first thing I was told by the 5 person panel [appointed Citizens] was that no one had bothered to read all of the evidence. I was then offered exactly 20 minutes to explain it to them; an impossible task. Ten minutes into it they told me that the County said they couldn't get into the area I was discussing, which by the way as the actual law of the State.
But I knew it was more of a formality even going to that level of the appeal process and that they would find against me; they always do. But I wanted a face to face, for the record, it is recorded on tape.
The next level is the State board of tax appeal and at that level things are much different, better in many ways for the Citizen. And I have always won something at that level; now that I have the court cases, the precedents they have been asking for, I am in a much better position for winning.
I am still battling with the county assessors office, trying to get full disclosure from them of their methods, how they really arrive at their determinations.
Even more important is that the assessor tells everyone, even prints it on his pamphlets, that he is
"required by law" to assess all property at
"100% of its Fair Market Value", I have been petitioning him for four years now to divulge exactly which law it is that is he is quoting. To date he has refused any response to that question, or to even acknowledge it was asked.
Not a big surprise considering that there is no such law. You see he is one of those in government that has created authority and powers off the grid, to suit himself, he has his own opinions of what is legal and what is not, of which portions of what the law requires him to do that he will comply with, or not. Since no one has ever challenged him he has been running free for years.
He knows I know he is lying to the People and that I can prove it.
My only problem is I can't afford the price of a good lawyer to haul him in front of a Judge. That will change at some point in the future. In the meantime he ducks and dodges me.
The latest ploy on his part is the sudden claim that he has found some 620 pages of documents under my request and wants me to pay for 25 cents a page for copies of them under the claim that what I requested disclosure of is outside the boundaries of my appeal.
Since all I have ever requested was full documentation of how he arrived at his determination, the methods used, I listed each thing the law requires him to use and noted that my request included but was not limited to those things I had written down, just in case I missed some specific type of document.
I sent him a reply stating I found it hard to believe he found that many pages for this one parcel, but that if I were to believe him and were to fork over the money he is demanding, I requested a signed affidavit that each of the 620 pages was specifically read, studied, and actually used in the assessment of the specific parcel in question. I'm not paying for pages that have nothing to do with it, pages that were not used as a part of the process for the parcel under appeal. More importantly is the still unaddressed, unanswered question of which law is he quoting to justify his overvaluation for the purpose of collecting tax revenue, that request was at the top of my letter.
So right now we are at a standstill I guess, because it's been well over two weeks and he has sent no response. Not unusual, he did the same thing last year. But someday he will stand before a Judge and I can't wait to be there to hear his excuses for failure to disclose.
In some ways this has come to be like a Keystone Cops comedy. But it is a most serious issue, one that has tremendous potential to upset the governments apple cart, and that also makes it a dangerous situation. Governments do not take lightly to anyone either limiting or reducing their taxing ability, their revenue stream. But like the Assessor also prints in his literature, we the people should pay "Not a Penny More" than what we are legally obligated to pay.
I still have a lot of research left to do, a lot of evidence to uncover, I need to get into the archives to root out the original records dealing with why True and Fair value was used instead of Fair Market Value. Some people tell me I am being too nit-picky over a few words, that I should just let it go and pay whatever is demanded.
What they fail to understand is that the law
is word specific and that being nit-picky over words and phrases is normal, is most common, in fact it is expected by the courts. After all, what is the law but words, and since we the people are held to the letter of the law it is our solemn duty and obligation as Citizens to see to it that the Government is also held to the same exacting standards as we the people; after all fair is fair, isn't it?
As time allows I will post explanations of the specifics of this case, explain to you what I have discovered, and why it is so important. It has taken me many years to gather the facts, to learn what I know of this area of the law, so please be patient with me as it will take a while to write it out so you can understand it, to teach it to you. It's like an onion, there are many layers involved.
I thank you for reading this far and I encourage you to join in, post your comments and ask a question when you need to. I will do my best to answer all that write.
For now I'll post this and add more as soon as I can.
I'll also be posting on other areas I have vested interests in, I hope you will enjoy reading and discussing those as well.